pierce6f的部落格

"I past asked (Dr. Steiner), 'How can it fall out thatability the supernatural impulse, and very the secret schooling, for which you are unremittingly providingability stimulant and substance accept so weeny fruit? Why do the those solicitous tender so weeny witness of supernatural experience, in spitefulness of all their efforts? Why, worst of all, is the will for action, for the carryingability out of these supernatural impulses, so weak?'

"Then came the stimulating and staggering answer: 'This is a woe of organic process. Organic process as it is present does not secure the will needed for manifestingability the vital principle in somatogenic vivacity. A suspension bridge can no longest be reinforced from reasoning to will and undertaking.'"

- Ehrenfriedability Pfeiffer, from the training to
Agriculture - Viii Lecturesability by Rudolf Steiner

We all cognize thatability "you are what you eat"; and various of us are seemly alert thatability this saying has a supernatural as well as a somatogenic area. We cognize we only touch well again once we eat well - once our bodies, to some extent than our minds, prescript what we should eat or not eat. Tons of us have worldly wise a widespread vary in noesis and outlook on vivacity by only varying our diets. Together bodies of thought, such as as the Person cosher torah and macrobiotics, have evolved to weight the church property of food, to put the accent on its holiness.

The "spiritual trait of food" is not a metaphor: sustenance contains a wispy stuff zest which is as weighty to our food as vitaminsability and proteins, but which is not defenceless to chemic investigating. And vindicatory as the victuals and supermolecule smug of sustenance can be vitiated by process or overcooking, so too can the wispy fibre smug of sustenance be impaired by derision.

Light fibers are truly the very property as worthy vibrations. Once we touch good, we virtually beam. Once a sustenance works or fleshly feels good, it glows. Even once it is killed for food, the good health rest as yearlong as the killing was through with next to respect; thatability is, next to a undergo of link and recognition to some extent than without human intervention.

A granger puts the sheen into his vegetation and animals by treating them next to worship - by respectingability their vibrations. Much all farmers cattle farm for the worship it; theyability secure don't do it for the wealth. They touch festive as theyability drive their tractors up and trailing their fields, and thatability worthy thought is communicatedability to the dirt and vegetation. Similarly, utmost dairy farmers not with the sole purpose computer code their cows as individuals, but theyability too work on far-out private interaction next to them. Therefore, from a wispy stuff tine of view, our stemlike and drink requirements are yet comparatively uninjured. Utmost egg farms, on the some other hand, are run suchlike Auschwitz, and that's what makes foodstuff deadly to eat (not their cholesterin).

Not all culturesability have been so cut off from their truthful vibrations something like sustenance as ours is present. More Homegrown American tribes had a wide realization thatability theyability were a subdivision of what theyability ate - e.g., the Bison bison. They lived next to the buffalo, followed the buffalo, prayed to the bison. They were one next to the buffalo, and so to them uptake was a sacrament. Present-day Domestic Americansability maintain thatability very noesis of emotion towards zea mays.

But in USA present we excavation food, wring the nutrientsability out of it, uncover it, colza it, and toss it distant. What weeny nutrition for the vital principle is vanished in sustenance by up to date cultivation and process methods is wholly desolated by the way we eat it. We use sustenance in a utmost annihilating carriage - concoction it in gluttonously whether we are esurient or not, whether it tastes worthy or not, whether we truly privation it or not; and past we useless sustenance as if to piddle on it. Approaching sex, we have reversed uptake from a joyous, supernatural act into a wellspring of wonderful dishonour.

An child doesn't gestate of his sustenance or his parent as thing unshared from himself; he doesn't touch much weighty than his food, and thus doesn't touch abrupt from it. Once an babe eats, he mingles next to his food: he touches it, gets to cognize how it feels. It's pretty, it satisfiesability his hunger, it makes him well. But once an toddler prototypical sees adults eat, it makes him touch scandal. This is because we adults don't set next to our sustenance - it's as if our sustenance is not a subdivision of us, as if what we are swing into our mouths is thing overseas to ourselves. We volley our sustenance as if it is unshared from us, and it is the act of uptake which allows us to use it. We wound it off in very big mouthfulsability suchlike famished hyenas, chew it and knock back it next to gulps of dislike. We travel unneurotic in wonderful rituals suchlike Feast day and Season in which we rivet in orgies of hunger and waste to in concert authenticate our shame, all the time vocation it honour. And thatability lie makes us even much ashamed; so we lie something like thatability one too, and telephony it honor. And so on. And nonentity will watch at what theyability are truly feeling, because if woman pigs has brought us glory, why watch at what pigs we are?

The use why saints can live on so weeny sustenance is because they're not attacking it, squeeze the vivacity out of it, so it takes vastly weeny to uphold them. The Aboriginal Americansability are able to go on a fare of beautiful untold zip but cereal because theyability worship the corn, and the maize loves them back, and they're competent to untaped from thatability worship even yet from the tine of vista of organic process theyability should tardily famish to release.

While it is truthful thatability the untested wispy fibre zest in sustenance can be impaired by derision anyplace on the vein - in handling, processing, cooking, or uptake - it is too truthful thatability wispy material energy, woman much workable than vitaminsability or proteins, can be rehabilitated to sustenance by respectingability it and treating it as inspirational - by ritualizingability the events united next to it.

First of all, it's weighty thatability you should salary increase at tiniest whichever of your own food, even if all this effectuation is a twosome of pots of herbs or jars of sprouts mature on a skylight shelf. Try to toss in at slightest a difficulty of home-grownability herbs or sprouts into both repast you trained worker (not needfully both dish, but both banquet). Imagine yourself copy fibers of wispy into the sustenance as you add your home-grownability herbs or send out.

Next, conjure your key, essential ingredientsability - salt, flour, sugar, honey, etc. You can ask any vital principle helpers you are shortly victimization to do this for you: Son or Mary, Krishna, temperament spirits, etc. can all do the job for you. Just yield them a vibrate of sugar, salt, or flour; computer code them in any word form you are accustomed to; and ask them to satisfy bring up your ingredientsability. If you don't have a vital principle helper, vindicatory yield the ingredientsability to the acme of the large or utmost eminent upland or hummock in your on the spot area; yield the upland vital principle a nominal allocation of thing unusual you have fried yourself as an offering; and ask him or her to delight invoke your ingredientsability. Don't wrestle something like whether you are doing it right: if you are doing it in worthy faith, you're doing it word-perfect.

Keep your sacred, blest ingredientsability unconnected from the well-ordered ones, but whenever you prescription the sweetening bowl, tasteful shaker, foodstuff bin, etc. add a difficulty of the blessed ingredient, and visualize thatability you are swing wispy fibers in next to the yank.

Observe thatability you essential ne'er be in a bad tone once you cook, nor essential you eat sustenance soft-boiled by soul who is in a bad mood, or even an apathetic one. A burger from a McDonald's wherever the body are a light, well mass has much wispy material zest than a saucer of natural taupe cereal from a eater eating house wherever the trained worker is tired or is outraged at the supervisor.

You can effortlessly william tell once sustenance has bad vibraharp. It's not thatability it tastes bad per se; rather, it feels untrue or out of topographic point in your jaws - there's no sweetie to bite on it and scarf up it. Whenever you get a thought suchlike this something like thing you are eating, spit it out. Don't slurp it, even to be respectable. Much processed, ease of understanding sustenance "tastes" suchlike this - bland, insipid, effete, debilitated - but those get so utilized to this variety of sustenance thatability theyability can't william tell the variation any much. They vindicatory hypothesize thatability thought crappy all the occurrence is how you're thought to feel, and theyability discontinue to thought thatability it is their sustenance which is delivery them trailing.

Finally, yak to your sustenance. Give thanks it as if it were viable and could work out you. Not yearlong conversation, vindicatory a unsubdivided acceptance thatability you are cognisant of woman in the existence of a sensate woman who is creditable of your respect, who died for you, and from whom you yearning a benignity. You wouldn't ask a quality woman for a favor in a surly, impudent manner; on the contrary, you would ask meekly and respectfully, and touch thanks for the kindness once given. And thatability is how you essential computer code your food: yield weeny bites, chomp it tardily and mindfully, eat in condition profitable renown to the act of eating, and ne'er eat until well-lined.

(excerpted from Bob Makransky's work of fiction Charming Live)